The 3 Rules of Air Leakage (Plus a Bonus!)
Here’s the thing. If you have anything to do with houses (home builder, remodeler, HERS rater, trade contractor, homeowner…), you probably ought to understand these three fundamental principles of air movement. Then you’ll have a better chance of knowing how to proceed when you have to pass a Blower Door test get a certificate of occupancy, when a new code (like North Carolina’s) requires you install make-up for the big range hood your client wants, or you just want to eliminate those drafts and be comfortable in your own home.
If you recall your Building Science 101, you know that we want to control the flows of heat, air, and moisture. To do so, you have to know how they work. That means understanding how the flow works, the driving forces, the pathways…
Ready? Let’s go.
1. For each cubic foot of air that leaks into the house, another cubic foot leaks out.
When there’s a hole somewhere in the building envelope and conditioned air leaks out of the house through it, you pay. Your heating or air conditioning system has done work to heat or cool that conditioned air that you’re losing, and you pay the fuel bill for it.
But that’s only half of the story. Not only are you losing the conditioned air, but you’re also pulling in unconditioned air through another hole (or perhaps the same hole if it’s big enough). When you turn on an exhaust fan in a bathroom or kitchen, you’re intentionally sending conditioned air to the outside. Each cubic foot that leaves is matched by a cubic foot of unconditioned air leaking in somewhere.
2. Air flows from areas of higher pressure to areas of lower pressure.
This is the force behind air movement. Think of that time you were at a concert or a festival or a big party. It’s wall-to-wall people, and you have difficulty moving. Then, up ahead, you spy an open area. There’s hardly anyone there, so you make your way over there and break out from the crowd and have freedom to move again.
That’s what air does, too. This is actually a result of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, one of the most baffling and fun laws of physics that you’ll ever find. Really!
3. For air to move, it needs both a pressure difference and a pathway.
As I just stated under law number 2, air responds to pressure differences. It can’t do anything, though, if it’s got nowhere to go. You may have a house with a higher pressure than outside and minimal air leakage if it’s got no holes, the pathways that allow the air to move from high pressure to low pressure. That’s why we air-seal houses. We can’t eliminate all pressure differences, but we can reduce the pathways.
Pressure is the basic quantity we’re dealing with here, so knowing exactly what pressure is can be helpful.
Bonus: Air takes the path of least resistance.
This one isn’t really on the same level as the first three, but it’s still important. One area where it comes into play is when you’re trying to connect the cubic feet of air coming in with the cubic feet going out. For example, some people make the really stupid move of installing power attic ventilators in their homes. (Yeah, I really did say that!) Sometimes the soffit or gable vents that are the intended source of make-up air don’t give the greedy fan as much as it wants, or at least, they don’t give it as easily as that open chase down into the basement or the unsealed top plates in the attic. So it reaches down into the house and pulls conditioned air up into the attic.
Air is a fluid. It flows. It has pressure. The pressure can go up or down, and that’s what drives the flow. Air takes the shape of whatever space it’s in and can be kept there when it’s bounded by materials that are impermeable to air.
Air is invisible. We take it for granted. Once we understand these basic principles of air leakage, though, it ceases to be a mystery.
What Is Pressure? – Understanding Air Leakage
Why Doesn’t Heat Flow Backwards?
How Much Air Leakage in Your Home Is Too Much?
Don’t Let Your Attic Suck – Power Attic Ventilators Are a Bad Idea
This Post Has 6 Comments
Powered attic ventilators
Powered attic ventilators would hardly be the house-suck travesty people say they are, if installed in pairs where one blows in, one blows out. Nobody seems to grasp this.
Then it would be merely a matter of energy (high) vs. benefit (small). Or cost vs. benefit. There ARE such things as low energy motors and more intelligent controls, but nobody seems to have applied that idea to the problem either.
M. Johnson: Even if power attic ventilators don’t suck air out of the house, that doesn’t mean they’re not a problem. If you do a great job air-sealing your ceiling and then install two fans as you describe, you’re still using excess energy, even with efficient motors. Passive ventilation works just fine.
Mark, a pair of fans would
Mark, a pair of fans would cost twice as much and use double the energy, with very little marginal benefit. Upgrading to ECM motors and more intelligent controls would indeed improve performance, but such a system would be be very expensive compared to the benefit. In any case, that money would be better spent on air sealing the ceiling and additional insulation.
Attic ventilators are also
Attic ventilators are also known to depressurize combustion zones and cause backdrafting. Just ask Jom Fitz. who turned it on while we were testing a furnace. Mucho CO in the face
immutable? sort of…&
immutable? sort of…
Law 1 is certainly true, but your example at the end is misleading I think.
“When you turn on an exhaust fan in a bathroom or kitchen, you’re intentionally sending conditioned air to the outside. Each cubic foot that leaves is matched by a cubic foot of unconditioned air leaking in somewhere”.
I read this statement to mean that the 50 CFM exhaust fan increases the infiltration rate by 50 CFM. But for typical existing homes in mid winter, when a 50 CFM exhaust fan only adds about 25 CFM to the total infiltration rate. The other 25 CFM comes from reducing the rate of flow out through the exfiltrating leaks. You only get 1 CFM of added infiltration per fan CFM when the fan is more than twice the natural leakage rate.
Your law # 2 is not actually technically correct — you are neglecting height/gravity. There is about a 25 pa pressure difference between the air at the floor and ceiling of an 8 foot high room. The weight of the air balances (and actually creates) the pressure difference and so there is no flow from the floor to the ceiling.
Your bonus description isn’t really completely accurate either. It would be more more accurate to say it takes all paths in inverse proportion to their resistances.
sorry to nit pick, but immutable is strong language 😉
Michael: Touché. You are of course correct, and I’ve changed the title to remove the offending word, ‘immutable.’ (I went ahead and changed ‘laws’ to ‘rules,’ too.) I had reservations when I put it there and should have heeded them.
I don’t care to go back into that whole stack effect diversion we had a few months ago (on GBA especially), but as you state in your comment, the barometric pressure is irrelevant to this discussion since it’s balanced by the weight of the air and cancels itself out.
Anyway, thanks for the clarifications and for keeping me honest. I guess I have a tendency to oversimplify sometimes, so it’s good to get called on it when I do.
Comments are closed.